SPINNING JOHN WESLEY
by Cal Thomas, March 31, 2004
THE OTHER DAY, a lesbian Methodist pastor was acquitted on charges stemming from her sexual orientation and will continue
in her ministry.  A jury of pastors in Bothell, Washington, deliberated for 10 hours before a majority ruled that the homosexual
relationship between the Rev. Karen Dammann and another woman, who were recently "married," is allowable under the church's
social principles, even though the Methodist Book of Discipline declares homosexual practice to be "incompatible to Christian
teachings."

Should anyone be surprised?   Having abandoned Scripture and the teachings of Methodism's founder, John Wesley, who believed that the Bible was G-D's infallible Word to man, it is a short step to rejecting all statements, "doctrines" and "principles" based on eternal truths.

If the Church can't uphold an eternal principle involving sexual expression and male-female relations, it puts everything up for
negotiations in our increasinly relativistic age where the truth can never be objectively determined. 

The conservative wing of the Methodist Church, known as the Confessing Movement, has it right.  Its Web page
(www.confessingumc.org/tract3.html) says, "The moral relativism of our time rebels against Jesus Christ's gracious rule over human sexuality.  This relativism and rebellion have found their way into the United Methodist Church.  There are those in the
Church who understand marriage as a short term contract, who desire to legitimize homosexual practice, and who care little about
protecting the unborn child and mother.  In some quarters of our denomination, premarital sex, extramarital sex, and serial marriage
are silently tolerated.  A confusion has arisen in our church between the Lordship of Christ and the reigning cultural virtue of
tolerance.  The Confessing Movement challenges the misuse of the principle of tolerance to set aside the authority of Scripture
and (the) Church's teaching on human sexuality."

In closing arguments at the church trial, Dammann's counsel, the Rev. Robert C. Ward, articulated a doctrine more befitting "the
church of what's happenin' now" than the historical and once doctrinally strong Methodist Church:
"We need to be careful about
creating rules that exclude people."
I guess he's never heard of the separation of sheep from goats, wheat from tares, the saved
from the unsaved and the afterlife separation of dwellers in heaven from residents of hell.  Would Ward include in his doctrine of
inclusiveness practicing adulterers (who, along with all other
unrepentant sinners are listed as people who have no hope of
attaining heaven)?  How about murderers, thieves and liars?  They are on G-D's exclusionary list, too.

It is too late for the Methodist Church (as with Episcopalians and their heretical brethren).  All of the
"confessing" movements
and attempts to turn things around are unlikely to succeed.  Once a denomination starts down the road of compromise, caring more
about what the world thinks than what G-D requires, it is nearly impossible to bring it back.  Only Southern Baptists in modern
times have succeeded in reversing a liberal trend, but not without a bruising fight.

The only course for people who still care what G-D thinks is to follow the instructions of Paul the Apostle:  "Come out from
among them and be separate."
John Wesley, believed in absolutes that those who claim him as their spiritual ancestor have abandoned.  He wrote:  "But the Christian rule of right and wrong is the Word of G-D, the writings of the Old and New Testa-
ment;  all that the Prophets and 'holy men of old' wrote' as they were moved by the Holy Ghost';  all that Scripture which was
given by inspriation of  G-D, and which is indeed profitable for doctrine, or teaching the whole will of G-D; for reproof of what
is contrary thereto;  for correction of error; and for instruction, or training us up, in righteousness" 

(a reference to 2 Timothy 3:16).

Dammann isn't the first lesbian ordained in the Methodist Church, but she should be the last tolerated by church members who
are faithful to something higher than the shifting winds of cultural change.  At the Methodist Church trial, a majority of jurors
failed their G-D and Methodism's founder.  They have lost their authority to speak for G-D or to man on G-D's behalf.  Methodists would be well advised to seek a denomination where G-D and not man is the supreme authority.
(c) Tribune Media Services
Article was posted on the "Forum" page of
The [Louisville, KY] Courier Journal, March 31, 2004
Return to Home Page