|WHY ISRAEL NEEDS A FENCE
by Benjamin Netanyahu, Published by The New York Times, July 13, 2004
|JERUSALEM -- While the advisory findings by the International Court of Justice last week that Israel's barrier in the West Bank is illegal maybe cheered by the terrorists who would kill Israeli citizens, it does not change the fact that none of the arguments
against the security fence have any merit.
First, Israel is not building the fence on territory that under international law can be properly called "Palestinian land." The fence
is being built in disputed territories that Israel won in a defensive war in 1967 from a Jordanian occupation that was never
recognized by the international community. Israel and the Palestinians both claim ownership of the land. According to Security
Council Resolution 242, this dispute is to be resolved by a negotiated peace that provides Israel with security and recognized
Second, the fence is not a permanent political border but a temporary security barrier. A fence can always be removed. Recently,
Israel removed 12 miles of the fence to ease Palestinian daily life. And last month, Israel's Supreme Court ordered the government
to reroute 20 more miles of the fence for that same purpose. In fact, the indefensible line on which many have argued the fence
should run -- that which existed between Israel and Arab lands before the 1967 war -- is the only line that would have nothing to
do with security and everything to do with politics. A line that is genuinely based on security would include as many Jews as
possible and as few Palestinians as possible within the fence.
That is percisely what Israel's security fence does. By running into less than 12 percent of the West Bank, the fence would
include about 80 percent of Jews and only 1 percent of Palestinians who live within the disputed territories. The fence thus will
block attempts by terrorists based in Palestinian cities to reach major Israeli population centers.
Third, despite what some have argued, fences have proved highly effective against terrorism. Of the hundreds of suicide bombings
that have taken place in Israel, only one was origniated from the Gaza area, where Hamas and Islamic Jihad are headquartered. Why? Because Gaza is surrounded by a security fence. Even though it is not complete, the West Bank security fence has already
drastically reduced the number of suicide attacks.
The obstacle to peace is not the fence but Palestinian leaders who unlike past leaders like Anwar Sadat of Egypt and King
Hussein of Jordan, have yet to abandon terrorism and the illegitimate goal of destroying Israel. Should Israel reach a compromise
with a future Palestinian leadership committed to peace that requires adjustments to the fence, those changes will be made. And
if that peace proves genuine and lasting, there will be no reason for a fence at all.
Instead of placing Palestinian terrorists and those who send them on trial, the United Nations - sponsored international court
placed the Jewish state in the dock on the charge that Israel is harming the Palestinians' quality of life. But saving lives is more
important than preserving the quality of life. Quality of life is always amendable to improvement. Death is permanent. The
Palestinians complain that their children are late to school because of the fence. But too many of our children never get to
school -- they are blown to pieces by terrorists who pass into Israel where there is no fence.
In the last four years, Palestinian terrorists have attacked Israel's buses, cafes, discos and pizza shops, murdering 1,000 of our
citizens. Despite this unprescedented savagery, the court's 60-page opinion mentions terrorism only twice, and only in citations
of Israel's own position on the fence. Because the court's decision makes a mockery of Israel's right to defend itself, the govern-
ment of Israel will ignore it. Israel will never sacrifice Jewish life on the debased altar of "international justice."
Benjamin Netanyahu is Israel's Finance Minister and a former Prime Minister.